|
1
|
- Dr. Gyula Kincses
- Ministry of Health, Social and
Family Affairs
|
|
2
|
- Extension of life, transformation of society’s age structure;
- - ageing of the population,
- - shift in the rate of the economically active and passive
- Harmonisation of certain diseases with life, thereby increasing the
proportion of people living with diseases and disabilities;
- Increasing demand to improve the quality of life for people with
disabilities;
- Expected leaps in the development of medicine and medical technology
(genetic engineering, biotechnology).
|
|
3
|
- Tendencies of health care (EU regulation)
- technological
development
- proper prevention,
improvement of lifestyle, reduction of adverse environmental effects
- improve quality of life, though increase expenditures.
- Social-economic polarisation increases, inequalities are not reduced.
- Welfare systems left to national regulation cannot follow the free
movement of persons and services.
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- Operation of the social sphere is based on social care and this
- underlies the responsibility of
particular states
- necessitates extension of
Community regulation to this
area (first as recommendations, Open Forum etc.).
- maintains the priority of
public financing in the
funding of welfare
systems
- The fundamental goal of the system lies in improving the quality of
life, fairness and equity.
- Value placed on the issue of care beside ensuring medical treatment and
financial services.
- Value placed on the concept of efficiency due to limited resources.
|
|
6
|
- Low GDP/capita
- Poor health status
- The problems arising from the change of age structure is becoming acute,
making quicker impact on countries. (The number of children is already
low, but the ageing of the population will follow only afterwards due to
improvement in mortality relations.)
- Looking at subsistence level from a European perspective, large
proportions of the societies are poor and owing to cultural differences
poverty is bound to stay for the long term.
- Due to inherited traditions social expectations are exaggerated, the
culture of self-care is low.
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
- Economic growth cannot keep up with the cost of the technological and
scientific development of health care
- Cause: the development of technology and science is exponential, whereas
the development of economy is linear at best
- Consequence: conflict of the „technologically possible ¹ economically
affordable”
|
|
10
|
- Increase of general life-expectancy, change in the age-mix of the
population, increase of the rate of persons living with disability and
permanent health impairment (increase of demand);
- Increasing value of health, increasing social safety, expansion of needs
of care (increase of needs);
- Development of medical science and technology (increase of treatment
possibilities);
- Development of health technology does not redeem labour force, thus
technological development has the result of increasing costs.
|
|
11
|
- The task is not simple:
- How to solve the problem of securing
- - sustainability,
- - fairness,
- - traceability
- of quality and technological development.
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- Due to historical reasons the health systems show great variation across
EU member states, and can be classified with difficulties even according
to main groups.
- In the same way there are great differences in the reimbursement systems
of services and there is no unified price system.
- Differences in expenditures are considerable.
- The solution conceived in the case of pension system does not work in
health care, thus the current situation makes the free movement of
persons and services quite difficult, that is, it runs counter to the
basic principles.
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
- The welfare and public service systems did not follow the changes of
social, demographic and professional environment.
- Decision must be made whether we adhere
- to our basic
principles and ideas or
- to our habits and
acquired rights.
- Necessary changes:
- - placing value on
self-care
- - strengthening of health
savings against the exlusive pay-as-you-go systems.
|
|
20
|
- Social care is gaining value, but requires new approaches
- beside the unchanged
need of solidarity subsidiarity also appears
- instead of equality it
builds on fairness and equality of chances
-
public care is exchanged for public service and assisted self-care
- New elements
- strengthening of the
institutes of health savings,
- integration of social
and health care,
- restructuring of
private health care financing.
|
|
21
|
- The integration and mutual strengthening of welfare systems may be the
engine of the internal cohesion of EU.
- In the restructuring process the common perspectives of fairness and
efficiency must be kept in mind.
- The common problem of social system lies in financing capacity and
sustainability, which can be reached only by the improvement of
efficiency and the strengthening of self-care (health savings).
- Social care and self-care must not conflict, but a co-operative,
synergist system must be established.
|
|
22
|
- In the interest of the above special attention must be given to:
- integration of the service and financing systems of health care,
ensuring free passage between them,
- restructuring the system, systematisation of self-care elements (health
savings),
- solution of the problems of care in an organised, mixed financing
system,
- tackling poverty, primarily in the accession countries, with the
introduction of complex community support programmes.
|